|
CHAPTER
24 WHAT
PRIVACY TELLS YOU ABOUT YOUR DICK Your
privates are no longer private. –The
Shepherd
Imagine
yourself as a peaceful alien from a distant galaxy. You land on earth and set
up an observation post unknown to the earthlings. You watch what goes on, and
since your technology enables you to see through buildings and clothing, the
things that you see are most interesting.
The observer notices some other peculiar things also. There are some
men who seem to enjoy having organs stuck into their mouths and backsides
also. There are also men and women in the Capitol buildings who engage in
self-service. If a female is not available or vice-versa, a hand motion
appears to produce the desired result.
So what do we tell our alien? Why is all this sexual activity so
hidden, so furtive? “Shame,” you say casually, as if that is a full
explanation, dependent on nothing else. What exactly is it that we are ashamed
of? “We humans are just embarrassed by certain things in general,” you
might say. True, but that is an obfuscation. Why don’t we say, after eating
five large cheeseburgers–if asked what we were doing– “I just finished
eating five big cheeseburgers?” We might prefer to say, “I just finished
eating.” What is the relationship between shame and privacy?
We are ashamed of what is immoral because activities covered by the cloak of
privacy are revealed to be moral or immoral by the degree of self-restraint or
lack of self-restraint that can now be plainly seen once that cloak is lifted.
If sexuality as a bodily function tends towards privacy, then why would
we engage in sexual activities that might become public? Bear with me on this.
If sexuality at its best is private, then sexual acts that tend towards
becoming public may be much less desirable. Now if someone finds out that you
are having sex with your spouse, no one cares, but the moment you have sex
with someone who is other than your spouse, everyone is interested. (By the
way, when was the last time you heard a married man boast of getting laid,
i.e., having sex with his wife?)
Having good sex with someone who is not your spouse is good (so you
think) only as long as it remains private. It ceases to be quite so good once
your wife discovers the activity. Privacy allows us to both hide what is
shameful, and secure from the gaze of others, events and actions that might
not be fully understood outside the subjective context of the people involved.
The subjective context of experience, however, is not always good, and
likewise, the objective analysis of subjective experience may be incomplete or
even undesirable. On this side of the coin, privacy shields us from
unnecessary embarrassment. Picking our noses, taking food out of our mouths,
or passing wind are sometimes requirements that we do not wish to share with
others, as we ourselves would not like to view others engaging in similar
actions. What could be more grotesque, for instance, than watching someone on
a public bus picking their ears and smelling their own ear wax? We just
don’t want to see it–just as we don’t want to watch anyone hurl the
contents of their stomachs anywhere near our shoes.
Therefore, privacy can be a shield for the best of what we do and the worst of
what we do. Privacy is morally ambivalent. Unfortunately, the ambivalence of
privacy is popularly used as a blanket to somehow sanction actions that have
historically been considered immoral. Copulating with a dead body is certainly
a private act, but is it a good act? This is what advocates of “privacy as
morality” overlook. There is the implicit assumption that because an act is
private it is not subject to the moral scrutiny of universal rules of good
behavior. The difficulty of drawing a moral line in the sand cannot be
equivalent to the assumption that there should be no line at all.
Sexuality creates its own form of privacy whereby there is a process of
inclusion involving the persons involved and an exclusion involving those who
are not allowed to participate. Privacy, like the dual-headed god Janus, has
two faces. There is good privacy and there is bad privacy. Good privacy builds
on a moral life but bad privacy destroys morality. Privacy is made good or bad
by what goes on inside the world of privacy. If you are mounting dogs or dead
bodies in your private sexual world, let’s just say that you have bad
privacy. Who would want to be part of your world, except maybe other dog
“lovers” or necrophiliacs? Certainly not your mother.
We might judge the goodness of our actions and indeed our lives, by the number
of people whose lives are improved as a consequence of our activities or good
example.
Somebody
figured it out–we have 35 million laws trying to enforce the Ten
Commandments.
–Anonymous
·
Are you
ashamed to be seen in public with the person you are having sex with? This is
not the sign of a healthy relationship. ·
If you do
not feel like talking to her after sex, what kind of relationship do you think
you have? ·
Do not lie
about your feelings to a woman. If you do, this will come back to bite you in
the ass. ·
Do you
think that just because no one sees what you are doing that it is good? ·
If you
feel ashamed after sex, your feelings are probably right. Shame can be the
function of a soul that knows itself better than the ego does.
|
||||||
|
||||||